Xenophon and Wilkie want $1 max bets under proposed pokies reform

Andrew Wilkie and Nick Xenophon propose new gambling reformsTasmania’s Andrew Wilkie and South Australia’s Nick Xenophon have teamed up to get the pokies reform back on the national agenda, with the intention of recreating the Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform that was active during the Gillard government. The reform aims to enforce a $1 maximum bet on all pokies, plus a ban on betting services being advertised during G-rated television programs.

Back in 2010, a pokies reform was a condition of Wilkie’s support for the Labor party, but he withdrew his support when the reforms didn’t quite cut the major overhaul he was looking for. The call for the reform has sparked heated debate, with Wilkie’s participation being criticised by his political opponents who have accused him of striking a deal with Malcolm Turnbull despite his fellow Tasmanians rejecting the coalition at the polls during July’s federal election.

Wilkie denied the claims he’d struck a deal with Turnbull, declaring, “I have given no support to any party, no support to any leader, I have done no deal with any party or any leader. All I have done is say that I will approach all parliamentary business on its merits.”

Julie Collins, Liberal MHR, criticised Wilkie, saying he “can spin it however he likes but the reality is he’s supporting a Liberal agenda rejected by the Tasmanian community.”

Politicians aren’t the only ones to criticise the potential pokies reform, with the Clubs Australia lobby group saying that introducing a $1 bet limit would cost around $1.5 billion to enforce, while doing nothing at all to curb problem gambling. Clubs Australia released a statement saying, “Clubs Australia, with the support of governments has introduced a range of evidence-based, cost-effective and targeted solutions to help address problem gambling, such as the world-first Online Multi-Venue Self-Exclusion system, club chaplaincy and counselling services.”

Clubs Australia Executive Director, Anthony Ball, said the $1 maximum bet policy had already been rejected by two Parliamentary inquiries, one of which was chaired by Andrew Wilkie himself.

Wilkie has accused the major political parties of holding off on addressing the issue of problem gambling due to their reliance on the funds generated from the gambling industry. He has now teamed up with anti-pokies renegade, Nick Xenophon, to see how they can influence the upcoming government on the importance of enforcing responsible gambling practices.

Xenophon said, “It ought to be done not because it’s a bargaining chip but this is the right thing to do. There are so many lives destroyed, so many people that have been bankrupted, so many families that have broken up and most tragically of all, people take their own lives, self-harm. We will keep pushing this. Ultimately if we don’t get reform in this Parliament, then this becomes a political issue in marginal seats,” he said.

Wilkie agrees with Xenophon, stating that the majority of the crossbench in the Lower House are in support of a gambling reform, and that a reform will always be at the top of his agenda. He said, “Predatory gambling is [a] litmus test of good government. If a government is prepared to sacrifice literally hundreds of thousands of individuals because of gambling policies that allow this level of harm, then what else is going wrong?”

With the results of the 2016 federal election causing major headaches for all involved, only time will tell what influence Wilkie and Xenophon manage to have on the call for a gambling reform.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>